Shooting for the Stars: Canon EF 18-55 Zoom Lens (Part 2)


I mentioned that I was going to write about this particular lens again, but never committed myself.

Until now. Prepare thyself! Grab your Canon EF 18-55 zoom lens—I’ll meet you outside.

I don’t want to simply repeat myself, so I’ll try to keep this article as fresh as possible. I’ll go over a few basics, such as:

  • Focusing

  • Angle of view / speed

  • Exposure lengths


Other than that, I’m going to explore the creative aspects of this lens. Feel free to read my first post on this particular lens—here.

First things first: Let’s take a gander at the tale of the tape.


  • Focal length = 18-55

  • Aperture = f/3.5-5.6

  • Angle of view = 74º 20′ – 27º 50′

  • Image stabilization

  • Filter Thread = 58mm

  • Price = $199.00

You can find this lens for cheaper on Amazon and other retailers. Shop smart. Shop S-Mart. You got that?


A Question of Possibilities


The main question that seems to be popping up is this: Is it possible to photograph stars with the Canon EF 18-55 kit lens?

Well, my friend, if it’s possible to have your very own circus of fleas—it’s possible to image stars with a Canon kit lens. The answer is: yes! You can certainly image the night sky with the Canon EF 18-55mm.

In fact, this particular lens is the first optical-baby I had the luxury of lugging under the stars. I used this lens for at least a year, maybe more. I’m not ashamed—I still use the lens under specialized circumstances.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: this lens is limited by your imagination. Period. There are naysayers out there who talk smack about this lens. Ignore them. When it comes to imaging the night sky; the Canon EF 18-55mm kit lens offers a wide range of possibilities.

I’ll list a few off the top of my head:


  1. Constellation portraits

  2. Planets

  3. Satellites

  4. Shooting stars

  5. Aurora

  6. Scenic moon shots

  7. Sun (proper filter)

  8. Milky Way

  9. A variety of optical phenomena (Sundogs, arcs, halos, etc.)



I’m sure there are a few that I forgot.

What are your goals? What do you want to photograph? These are the questions you need to ask yourself. If you’re creative enough—you can bend this lens to your will. I’m not saying it will be easy, but the possibilities lie within you as a photographer.


 Focus, Focus, Focus


Image quality is dependent on three factors:


  1. Weather

  2. Focus

  3. Tracking


You can’t control the weather (I hope), but you sure as hell can control your focusright?

If you want pin-point stars: spend the effort to achieve a nice focus! Don’t just crank the focus ring, glance at the camera’s LCD screen and say: Yup! Looks good to me.

Does it really look good?


Ewww! Look at those bloated stars! This is a completely out of focus image. The worst example possible of a “focused” image.

Let’s take a look at another:


How ’bout this one? Doe’s it look visually delicious? Ehhh, not really. Yes, it’s better compared to the first image, but I think we can do better:


Ahhhh, much better! The stars have lost considerable weight at a stellar rate—They on some kind of fat burner. You know what? I think we can do better:


That’s about as skinny as we can get. I’ll let you decide which image is more aesthetically pleasing.

Remember: Zoom in as far your camera allows. If your stars begin to bloat under a little magnification, then re-focus. Then re-focus again. Constantly compare your exposures until you are satisfied with the results.

Don’t you dare touch the lens barrel once you acquired an optimal focus!  You will nudge the focus ring and guess what? That’s right! Start alllll over again. Hey—don’t laugh—it happens to the best of us.

Here are a few tips to achieve a katana-sharp focus:


  • Pick out the brightest object in the sky

  • Aim camera at target

  • Increase ISO to 1600

  • Open aperture

  • Turn on “Live View”

  • Focus

  • Magnify 5x

  • Focus

  • magnify 10x

  • Focus

  • Turn on camera’s 2sec. timer (or mirror-lock up)

  • Turn off all Image-stabilization

  • Readjust ISO (if desired)


I know it seems like a daunting process, but you’ll get used to it. You can try to eyeball the focus through the camera’s viewfinder, but keep in mind, the field of view is not bright.

If for some reason you are unable to see any stars or planets through your camera’s LCD screen AND are unable to eyeball a focus through the viewfinder—it’s still possible to focus.


  1. Twist focus ring all the way to the left.

  2. Gradually turn the focus ring

  3. Blast off an exposure

  4. Once again, gradually turn the focus ring

  5. Blast off an exposure

  6. Compare images

  7. Repeat until the image is focused


This method, by far, is the most pain in the ass method to focus. It’s time consuming, but it does’ work.

Focus on a planet like Jupiter, or the brightest star that happens to be out at the time. The LCD screen on a DSLR will easily display bright objects in the night sky—use it to your advantage. Or squint. The choice is yours.


**Remember to turn off image stabilization! When I started to use this lens, I always forgot to flip the switch. Even if your camera is steady, the stabilization will kick in and try to find some vibration to stifle. As you have probably guessed, this causes subtle vibration. I know it’s a bit of a paradox that image stabilization makes your image less stable in this scenario, but get use to it. Flip the switch.**


Be Careful Not to Expose Yourself


It’s important to dial in the exposure time that’s appropriate to the focal length of the lens you’re using. The longer the focal length, the shorter the exposure needs to be if you’re shooting without a tracking system.


  • 18-24mm = About 30 seconds

  • 35-55mm = About 10 Seconds


If you are using a camera that has a crop sensor—the focal length of a particular lens  increases by either 1.6x (Canon) or 1.5x (Nikon).

The brainbusting equation goes a little something like this:


55 x 1.6 = 80mm


When you are imaging stars, the increase in focal length matters greatly, especially when trying to figure out what exposure times to dial in. If you’re just starting out, and you use a crop sensor camera—crack open that manual and check for the exact crop factor.

So, if you’re zoomed all the way in with your Canon EF 18-55 kit lens (55mm), you’ll want to account for that increase in focal length AND the crop factor.

Personally, I like to keep the exposure length between 8-10 seconds at 55mm. At the widest angle (18mm) I keep the exposure around 30 seconds.

ISO is a judgement call you’ll have to figure out on your own. I don’t know what the environment is like, so I can’t suggest a universal ISO. Light pollution should be considered when you adjust the ISO. Try 800 and work your way up (if you can). Keep an eye on noise as well. Nobody likes noise.


Creative Me Timbers


As I promised: It’s time to discuss the creative aspects of the Canon EF 18-55 kit lens. In actuality, the creative aspect lies within yourself—not necessarily the lens. The power in the lens is its versatility. Once you understand the angle of view of a particular focal length, you can imagine what will fit within that particular canvas.

The more you zoom in, the smaller your angle of view becomes. Just how small is a matter of degrees, and more importantly, experience. The more you use any lens, the more the angle of view becomes burned into your mind.

When you frolic around the planet, be on the look out for interesting foreground objects. You can do this during the day, it’s not necessary to wait until night. But you’ll discover scenes as you walk around by happenstance.

The more you look, the more you see.

There could be interesting terrestrial objects all around you that you never thought to include in the sky.



I’ve walked past this fence for years. When I learned to ‘look big’, this scene jumped out at me. Normally I wouldn’t have gave a rat’s ass about this sign. But when you include a canvas of stars—things change. Especially if a sign specifically demands that you don’t loiter after dusk.


Here’s another scene that I happened across. I would of preferred if the trees along the bottom of the frame weren’t there, but besides that, I like the image. The planet toward the upper right is Venus, while the planet toward the middle left is Jupiter.

That’s what’s nice about the Canon EF 18-55mm. With a twist of the barrel, you can go wide to capture large swaths of the sky. Train yourself to ‘look big’, and scenes like this will manifest before your very eyes.


Here’s another scene that I stumbled across. I thought the angle of trees would be an interesting foreground object, although I had to take some time to get this to look like how I wanted it to. I know it may not look like I put much thought into the image, I did. Trust me. Given the area I was in, this too bad an image. The planet to the right of the moon is Jupiter.

One thing is for certain: The image would flat out suck if I hadn’t included any foreground object. Imagine a lonely moon and planet, sitting in a bland blue canvas all by themselves. It’s heart breaking just to think about.

There’s always something to include in a scenic night image. Unleash your imagination.


This basketball hoop is not far from the no loitering sign. Who doesn’t like stellar basketball?!?! Come on, you know you do as well.

As I say: The more you look, the more you see.

If light pollution is pretty nasty where you live, image the sky before all the lights come on. There are plenty of bright objects that can be seen at or near dusk: planets, crescent moons, satellites, bright constellations.

You don’t have to wait until it’s pitch black. Light pollution tends to be less severe after midnight, but I’m sure that’s location dependent.


The bright star in the middle of the image is Vega. This was taken about a half hour after the sun went down (around twilight). I tried to get the tree toward the bottom right of the frame to point at Vega, but I didn’t have too much success.

Try to use the natural scenery that happens to be around you. If you can discover ways to include them in your scenic images, a world of possibilities opens up—even if you have to suffer through minor light pollution.


Here’s what I mean: this image was taken just before all the nights in my area turned on. Notice the reddish beam of light toward the bottom of the frame? That’s the light from a street lamp. Ain’t it lovely? This image was actually taken with a different lens (24mm prime, but the focal length is well within the Canon EF 18-55 focal range.

Sure—the image kind of sucks—but it perfectly illustrates my point that it’s possible to image stars before light pollution becomes too much of an issue.


Here’s another image taken before nightfall. The point of light in the middle of the frame is Venus. I messed up this image: I wanted Venus to be centered further below the frame, but like I said, I messed up. Please forgive me.

Stars and Cars-1

Don’t be shy! Go crazy! Lock ‘n’ load that camera and blast off some exposures. Who cares if some of them turn out like dog turds. Take advantage of the versatility this lens has to offer.


At its widest angle, you can stuff a variety of objects within the frame. Don’t mind the fancy glow that I added around the stars, Sirius, Regal, and Aldebaran. I also saturated the colors quite a bit, but that’s besides the point.

If you want to stuff constellations inside a frame, the Canon EF 18-55mm doe’s a decent job of doing just that, my friend. If you own a full frame sensor camera—your angle of view will be even wider.


Oh look at that! An unprocessed image of the Big Dipper. This particular asterism takes up a chunk of sky. The handle alone is about 10º across.  The nice thing about shooting wide is that star trails are less apparent. You can get away with a few extra seconds of exposurer and it won’t affect your image quality too much.

Notice the lack of foreground? Depending on what your goals are, the quality of your image might suffer if you only shoot the sky. This is not always the case, but be conscious of what’s in the frame.


To The Stars We Go


So, is it possible to image stars with the Canon EF 18-55 zoom lens? I hope I proved that imaging stars is indeed possible, plus more.

If you don’t already own the Canon EF 18-55mm zoom lens, I suggest purchasing one. I’m sure you can find it for less than $100 if you’re really frugal. Price wise, if you casually want image the sky—I highly suggest this lens.

My only gripe about the lens is the light-weight construction. The lens does not feel adequate in my hands. If they spent a little more effort on the mechanical quality, people wouldn’t shy away from it as much. In my opinion, Nikon managed to get it right with their version of the 18-55 kit lens. It feels more like a lens instead of a toy.

If you own the Canon EF 18-55mm kit lens and don’t use it—imaging the night sky is a convenient way to become acquainted with the lens.

Published by FlyTrapMan

I have no idea what I'm doing.

6 thoughts on “Shooting for the Stars: Canon EF 18-55 Zoom Lens (Part 2)

  1. Great article. I like taking the night sky as well, but I’m always looking to better myself. I also have the 18-55 lens.
    Could you clarify what you meant under “Focus Focus Focus” bit about zooming in 5x? The lens isn’t a 5x zoom. You probably mean something else, do you mean how many times to do it?

    Anyway like I say super post.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for reading the post and commenting!

      You’re correct — Canon’s 18-55 zoom lens will not magnify 5x. I’m referring specifically to the camera LCD magnification. Most DSLR cameras have a magnification button. Press that button and you’ll “zoom” into the image. Most camera’s will allow you to magnify up to 10x (on the LCD screen).

      Zoom lenses can be difficult to focus. I always turn on the camera’s Live View, and then magnify the image as much as possible.

      I should have made the post more clear! I apologize for the confusion.

      If you have any more questions — feel free to let me know!


  2. I’m not a photographer, but I was still impressed by your post and all the little intricacies regarding those lens. The star photos are amazing! Lastly, I loved the subtitles you used, like “Be Careful Not to Expose Yourself” and “Creative Me Timbers.” Brilliant and funny!


    1. Thanks! I wrote this particular post quite some time ago, and to be honest — I don’t remember too much of it! Haha.

      If you ever decide to get a DSLR and come across this particular lens, or one like it — don’t succumb to thenaysayers — it will do the job. Sort of.


      1. Hi, a very interesting technique to do it and I want to try it. You know what it’s like though, you want to try something new and it’s cloudy for days and weeks on end 😉

        The way I’ve been doing it is using manual focus, I’ve got some really pleasing shots, but it is a hit and miss thing at times and I have to have the aperture open wider than maybe I should. I think your way would be more accurate if I could get out and give it a try. We live in the hills so we get loads of mist so it’s not always clear.


        Liked by 1 person

      2. I know what you mean. I live in CT and the weather is unpredictable. Looking through the viewfinder and eyeballing the focus can work — assuming there’s a bright enough star or planet you can visually focus on.

        Magnifying the image on the camera’s Live View will allow you to fine tune the focus (much more accurately than visual focusing through the viewfinder).

        You may have to use a high ISO to see a star through the LCD screen. Remember to adjust the ISO before you take your image.


Express yourself

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: